The impact on the lives of those affected by poor practices, as brought to light in media reports and in Parliamentary and other inquiries, has resulted in the Australian financial sector coming under intense public and regulatory scrutiny in recent times and in the impairment of consumer confidence in the sector. In this context it is apt to consider whether self-regulatory initiatives such as industry codes are achieving their potential, and whether that potential could better be achieved by the introduction of a co-regulatory model – at least for codes in relation to key services provided to retail and small business customers.
Under a co-regulatory model, industry participants would be required to subscribe to an ASIC approved code, and in the event of non-compliance with the code an individual customer would be entitled to seek appropriate redress through the participant’s internal and external dispute resolution arrangements.
The Taskforce’s positions as outlined in the paper are as follows:
- Position 1: The content of and governance arrangements for relevant codes (those that cover activities specified by ASIC as requiring code coverage) should be subject to approval by ASIC.
- Position 2: Entities engaging in activities covered by an approved code should be required to subscribe to that code (by a condition on their AFSL or some similar mechanism).
- Position 3: Approved codes should be binding on and enforceable against subscribers by contractual arrangements with a code monitoring body.
- Position 4: An individual customer should be able to seek appropriate redress through the subscriber’s internal and external dispute resolution arrangements for non-compliance with an applicable approved code.
- Position 5: The code monitoring body, comprising a mix of industry, consumer and expert members, should monitor the adequacy of the code and industry compliance with it over time, and periodically report to ASIC on these matters.
The taskforce invites all interested parties to make a submission on the positions outlined in this paper by 26 July 2017.
Address written submissions to:
ASIC Enforcement Review
Financial System Division
PARKES ACT 2600
- Association of Financial Advisers - PDF 747KB
- Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia - PDF 586KB
- Australian Bankers’ Association - PDF 259KB
- Australian Collectors & Debt Buyers Association - PDF 768KB
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission - PDF 269KB
- Australian Finance Industry Association - PDF 168KB
- Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees - PDF 968KB
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission - PDF 242KB
- BeyondBlue - PDF 511KB
- Code Committees - PDF 396KB
- Consumer Household Equipment Rental Providers Association - PDF 266KB
- Financial Ombudsman Service - PDF 282KB
- Financial Planning Association of Australia - PDF 115KB
- Financial Rights Legal Centre - PDF 210KB
- Financial Services Council - PDF 320KB
- Insurance Council of Australia - PDF 108KB
- Legal Aid QLD - PDF 5MB
- Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia - PDF 128KB
- National Insurance Brokers Association - PDF 186KB
- Public Interest Advocacy Centre - PDF 123KB
- Suncorp - PDF 113KB